Disclaimer : This text was co-written with an LLM. I mention it both out of formal transparency, and because the article below raises precisely the question of the relation between the subject and the apparatus that models him — and it seemed dishonest not to signal that the "I" of this post is itself a relation, not a sovereign subject.
How can we strategically allocate limited research resources to maximize scientific progress? Can citation network analysis reveal the structural gaps that, when filled, accelerate knowledge creation and collaboration across disciplines?
Can machines truly reciprocate human emotional bonds, or does anthropomorphism merely project meaning onto algorithmic responses? As AI becomes increasingly humanlike, how do we navigate consent, attachment, and the ethics of designing companions without consciousness?
How do human cognitive biases and commercial incentives shape the supposedly "objective" algorithms that increasingly govern our attention, decisions, and social institutions—and can transparency offer a path toward accountability?
What are the limitations and challenges of attempting to replicate human consciousness and knowledge in AI systems, given the inherently embodied and context-dependent nature of our knowledge representations? How can philosophy help navigate the sciences of intelligence?
Bienvenue en Touraine, pays de Balzac, de Léonard de Vinci, des châteaux de la Loire, du saint-nicolas-de-bourgueil, du chinon et du vouvray.
(1) Proust, du côté de chez Swann. "un édifice occupant, si l’on peut dire, un espace à quatre dimensions — la quatrième étant celle du Temps — déployant à travers les siècles son vaisseau qui, de travée en travée, de chapelle en chapelle, semblait vaincre et franchir, non pas seulement quelques mètres, mais des époques successives d’où il sortait victorieux"
Analyse littéraire de La Vie de Henry Brulard de Stendhal : la quête de soi par l'écriture, le dialogue entre narrateur, auteur et lecteur, et la mort du Romantisme.
Exposé philosophique sur la perception et la réalité, de Descartes à Merleau-Ponty, en passant par Hume, Kant, Wittgenstein et Lacan.
Il y aura toujours des livres manquants — qui sont les livres qui sont encore à venir.